Friday, April 29, 2011

WI 10: connections

the one that almost got away......




http://image.stock-images-illustrations.com/em_w/02/31/38/608-02313870w.jpg


Looking at where I was at the beginning of this semester to where I am now, I can honestly say that I have never felt more accomplished in this major. During our first class, we wrote down our individual design goals for the semester and also answered questions to see which type of personality we had. At first, I did not think anything of this and saw it as a mere way to introduce the class. However, as the semester has progressed, I have been able to understand why design goals and where our personality fits in as value. On the spectrum, I was the mediator. I tend to want to please everyone and can see both sides of the story. This seems like it would be a great attribute, however, there were times during the semester where I felt my design voice would get lost. There would also be times where being the mediator helped the group move forward.




https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtnGtBkIk3mF74tAasR5yJCCbsyK5mgNaNI8dbi7mAcLF7Ynal6xKMBrHmQz9Lc6PZ4fz5lE8sYy_3YY58t1eFAgKfO9MoDYFV9em2yd3DnyMiJkC_hzTZkeIt2-2ncPRo7Ja7v7Op4OFU/s400/charles-schulz-peanuts-5.jpg

As far as my design goals, I wanted to communicate my ideas more clearly, know which direction I want to go in design, and learn rhino. Until now, I have not really thought about these design goals; but I now realize that I have accomplished more in this semester than I realized. I think I have grown as a designer, and learned how to balance my natural “people-pleaser self” with a confident person. This has helped me communicate ideas and let others know of my abilities.


Throughout the course of this semester, one lesson that will remain with me is to constantly design. This process should never have a start or finish, but rather a continuous process. For the first phase of Jenga, I thought too much about the design rather than producing any work leaving a project where final deliverables were rushed and not thought out. This became a decreasing problem as the semester continued. I learned that designing and producing work should happen simultaneously and nothing should be left until last minute.




http://www.cfcn.org/J16/images/stories/old_clock_by_neyle1.jpg


My experience with group work has varied through this semester. At first, I did not know how to balance all the many deliverable with the many floating ideas of other peers and produce work on a timely manner, However, my favorite group experience was Jenga 4.0 where we worked in teams of three again. The first iteration of teams of three was successful, but the second time we were more familiar with how each individual worked and able to create a strong design. Teams of six was not as hectic of a transition than thought. We actually produced great work where many of our design voices were seen. However, I felt like my voice was heard more in teams of three. The final phase of Jenga was intense with a team of 12 people. Though, I focused my attention on interior components, I felt the design was never truly accomplished. In teams of 12, it was difficult to please every person, and the design did not move along. In the future, I will remember that teams of three are effective. Teams change and this requires a flexibility from each person to ensure a job well done.


Looking at all the sheets of paper from this semester, there have been many opportunities to grow as a writer. As I have mentioned before, I think writing often gets overlooked and not given as much thought. I think writing is an important aspect of design. Many times our writing clarifies our work. My favorite writing assignment was when we wrote the narrative of our space. This was a whole new process for me but moved my design along. I think brainstorming ideas and writing about design can help it seem more real rather than just a thought.


http://www.philnel.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/stack-of-papers.jpeg



As a designer, my skills in presentation have most definitely improved. My digital work has come a long way from the sloppy cardboard models I turned in for Jenga 1.0. Though I am not proud of the work I turned in at the beginning, it is exciting to see how much I can accomplish in the course of one semester. Through critiques and cross training, I have acquired many new skills. I feel confident moving forward in this major as a third year student. I think my design voice still yields to community design, but I am most rewarded by all the valuable knowledge and experiences from this semester. I may have been the one who almost got away but I have grown as a designer and a person.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Jenga 7.3: friendly assessment

During studio, we were each assigned one hour of first year studio final presentations to review. I chose to review Caitlyn Whisenant and her take on a writer's residence. Overall, I think Caitlyn was successful in communicating her ideas clearly, constantly referring to her drawings. Her concept of theatre, allowed for many opportunities to enhance the space. I thought her attention to the hearth as the focal point was a smart decision to remain true to original character in the building. Her choice in a raised ceiling in this area added to the dramatic effect of this congregated space, while private spaces had a lower ceiling to achieve a more intimate feel. I think her project stood out most to me in this one hour was because of her attention to detail.

However, with the idea of theatre in a writer's setting, I think the manipulation of light could have been incorporated more. Without specific lighting, theatre would not have the drama or effects it has. Especially with this area being a writing residence, light is an important aspect. I think this specific detail was overlooked. With more attention to light and shadows, perspective drawings would look more realistic.

Overall, I think Caitlyn did a great job in presenting her take on a writer's residence. Special attention to details will continue in her design being successful.

Jenga 7.0

Jenga 7.0 marked the final phase of Jenga and the end of the semester. For this part of the project, the studio became two teams of twelve. Our team of six merged with team Tripede to form team Portmanteau signifying two various ideas combining into one. With a focus on site, building, public spaces, circulation of space, our individual unit, the components within the building, and the finishes, we designed a 12+story building in wellington, New Zealand. This building merges the idea of strong verticality, lightness, and our individual concept word to form a building where the "whole > sum of its parts."

Individual work:

Group work:
building on site


site montage
site plan
technical drawings





circulation diagrams

digital renderings




Custom furniture pieces












Sunday, April 3, 2011

the start of Jenga 7.0

For this portion of Jenga (and the last), we have become a team of 12 people to bring the two Jenga 6.0 designs to form one cohesive building on a specific site. Today, group [E]merge and group Trepide met to discuss how out two individual buildings will come together for Jenga 7.0. In each building, a similar design language of horizontal and verticals occur. Materiality emphasizes these horizontal planes and verticality. Trepide incorporates glass to show the dematerialization as one move upwards while the C-shaped balconies gradually become smaller. We realized that our two concepts are similar but the way it is shown varies. Connections and the space in between are opportune moments for public spaces. We discussed how there is a centralized confusion in the sense that the deconstruction of elements shows variation but in a central, gradual way.

This idea of deconstruction and dematerializing led to the team name of Portmanteau. A portmanteau is a combination of two or more separable aspects or qualities. For example.....


spoon + fork = spork

This shows the merging of two concepts to become one strong design. Using an abstracted C-shaped form to encompass the two units together and incorporating the protruding balconies will speak to both team’s original concept. I am excited to see the progression throughout the next 3 weeks and how this concept will evolve.



Friday, April 1, 2011

Jenga 6.0

During this phase of Jenga, we continued to work in teams of 6 to focus on more details from Jenga 5.0. We refined many details of interior spaces while choosing Valle de Bravo as our site that had a similar expression as our building. Additionally, we were assigned a Charles and Ray Eames textile and chair that was incorporated into our design. We were also were expected to design an entrance for the building as well as for our individual units.

site plan



image montage of site

building on site

front building entrance

view from front building entrance

view from front building entrance

view from front balcony

view from back balcony

meeting area with Eames textile and chair

my door

Abigail's door

Austin's door

Cory's door

Kacie's door

Leslie's door